14th_cylon

@14th_cylon@lemm.ee

Este perfil es de un servidor federado y podría estar incompleto. Explorar más contenido en la instancia original.

14th_cylon,

did you seriously wrote like a million paragraphs to explain why it is crucial to start saying “threadiverse” because “fediverse” is bad? 🤣

14th_cylon,

I think their explanation is valid and important

you mean this explanation?

TL:DR: “Threadiverse”: Thread+Universe+Diverse+Fediverse+Threadiverse

i think it is a joke. people who are staying on reddit right now are doing that because they don’t care about fediverse and are still happy with scrolling through w/e they are scrolling on reddit right now. if that changes in the future, it is not going to be because someone changes fediverse to threadiverse.

Early adopters not caring about branding is one of the reasons their software stays in a minority

that is absolute nonsense. it is the product that makes the brand, not the other way around. if you have good product, you will make word-class brand from random mix of characters like “google”. if you have bad product, no brand is going to help you.

that is not to say that fediverse is bad product, it is purely comment on people overestimating the almighty brand.

14th_cylon,

I’m not saying that it’s vital we have a good name to sum up this segment of the fediverse for it to succeed; I’m saying it’ll probably succeed faster if we have one.

i am saying it does not matter. people go to buy/use product or service because it is good product, not becaus it has nice name.

beside, i question your idea that threadiverse is for some strange reason better than fediverse. it is longer, harder to pronounciate and write, and people really do not care whether it is somehow mix of four different words.

14th_cylon,

perhaps I wasn’t clear enough; but I’m not saying fediverse is a bad term that needs replacing; nor am I saying the threadiverse won’t succeed if it’s not called the threadiverse– I’m saying that fediverse is a broad term that encompasses all of the connected sites here; not just the thread-based forum ones–it’s a broad umbrella term, and a good one.

i get that part, but i am saying that the name is not a reason why people did or did not came here and will have zero name on the speed of the migration.

people who are here now are mostly people who are fans of opensource and were willing to go through the birth problems because of that. they did not came because of the name.

the rest of the people will number of their friends here reach some critical mass for them to notice.

you have live example of this in musk trying to rebrand twitter right now. he thinks he will change the clusterfuck he created by changing the name, but he doesn’t get that name is not the problem and will have zero effect.

unless you have real name for changing the brand (like two companies merged and you want the branding to reflect that), changing the brand is usually desperate act of clueless manager who just doesn’t have better idea.

You’re perfectly entitled to disagree, but I’d appreciate it if you didn’t try to shut down productive discussion just because you personally don’t see the need for more specific terminology.

  1. having opposite opinion is not "shutting down the discussion"
  2. you are overestimating my powers - i can guarantee that people will say their piece without regards to what i did or did not say ;)
14th_cylon,

i almost feel sorry for that yellow fruit that is going to die horrible death 😞

https://i.imgur.com/1W4RXjj.png

14th_cylon,

the prevailing opinion seems to be that we should promo “fuck spez” and it is already underway 😆

lemm.ee/post/1633300

Does anybody feel like the quality of reddit has already dropped massively? (kbin.social) en

I see a lot of comments from bootlickers on how the protests are dumb and stupid and dont work and engagement metrics are still holding but the quality of posts and comments has noticeably depreciated imo. So much so that whenever I visit the site Im actually shocked at how bad it is.

14th_cylon,

the fediverse already encourages multiple parallel communities

this is first thing fediverse has to fix if it wants to get somewhere. for a community to be useful, you need people interested in the topic concentrated at one place, so you can profit from that crowd wisdom. 100 people spread over 80 communities is not going to be much useful.

  • Todo
  • Suscrito
  • Moderado
  • Favoritos
  • random
  • noticiascr
  • CostaRica
  • Todos las revistas