@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

ada

@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone

I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone

Este perfil es de un servidor federado y podría estar incompleto. Explorar más contenido en la instancia original.

maegul, a fediversenews en
@maegul@hachyderm.io avatar

The Fedipact statistics are interesting

7% of active users committed to - https://fedidb.org/current-events/anti-meta-fedi-pact

  • How representative of the user base is this, or are admins gatekeeping here? A large survey would be good to clear that up.

  • EG, Mastodon, relative to its userbase, seems the most "Meta friendly" with only 57% of fedipact users (but ~80% all users)

  • Fractal of niche-dom? Fedi ~1% of social media, fedi-pact ~ 10% of fedi. So anti-meta-fediverse ~0.1%?

@fediverse
@fediversenews

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I’m not sure how much faith you can put in those stats. My two instances are both defederated from Meta platforms for example, but I haven’t signed the Fedipact. For me, it’s not about Meta itself, but because they house hate groups. If they stopped doing that, I’d federate with them

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I don’t see them removing the hate groups any time soon, but as far as my defederation approach goes, that just makes them like any other hate platform on the fediverse. They get blocked and I move on.

Would it be a good idea to have a more accurate (and therefore higher) number on how many Threads defeds there are?

I’m not sure that it makes much of a difference to anything? It won’t change Meta’s approach to the fediverse, and the pact tracker will never have accurate numbers because of people like me and people that that defederate without even knowing the pact exists.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I would also not federate with one platform 10x bigger than the whole fedi.

See, I would be ok with that, if they weren’t full of hate.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It’s not a matter of getting it “under control”. The trolls specifically create accounts with us to get us defederated, including verifying email and answering approval questions.

The thing that is meant to stop them (rate limiting) doesn’t work.

In short there is nothing we can do to get it under control short of blocking them when they slip through the cracks.

If that’s not good enough and you still want to defederate, well, that was their goal…

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The rest of the lemmyverse has put up with kbins spam problem for months. You’ll handle a few days from us

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Despite the teething problems, you’re doing a great job with kbin. In my mind, it’s got more potential than lemmy does!

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It still won’t make sense when you’re sober, but you get used to it :)

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Best just to scroll past them.

The joy of being an admin. I can do much more than that :)

banning and defederating communities (kbin.fedi.cr)

Hey all, I recently left reddit like many of you. I have a question regarding lemmy and the fediverse on the history of banning and defederation. I have noticed several posts calling for varying communities to be disconnected. were these removal requests as prevalent before the mass migration? Usually I am all for communities...

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I did for some research. Basically, all the top-defederated instances on this list

FYI, that list is generated by kiwifarms software. You should not be linking to it directly

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The reason I am on lemmy.world is that so far, they have basically blocked nothing

https://lemmy.world/instances

  • Todo
  • Suscrito
  • Moderado
  • Favoritos
  • •
  • random
  • noticiascr
  • CostaRica
  • Todos las revistas
    •