conciselyverbose

@conciselyverbose@kbin.social

Este perfil es de un servidor federado y podría estar incompleto. Explorar más contenido en la instancia original.

Scientist, after decades of study, concludes: We don't have free will (phys.org) en

Before epilepsy was understood to be a neurological condition, people believed it was caused by the moon, or by phlegm in the brain. They condemned seizures as evidence of witchcraft or demonic possession, and killed or castrated sufferers to prevent them from passing tainted blood to a new generation.

conciselyverbose,

Behave is a great (if fucking beefy) read on a broad variety of influences on human behavior (it's 1B to Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow on my nonfiction list), but one expert's opinion on something as inherently unmeasurable as free will doesn't warrant a news story.

conciselyverbose,

I'm interested in how sharing works. A lot of the former favorites transitioned to forcing you into their awful apps.

It would also depend a lot on pricing. I understand the issues places had just allowing unlimited photo hosting for free, but there would need to be a lot of value added beyond that before it's something I'd pay much for. I understand the business realities, but I haven't found anything with the right balance.

conciselyverbose,

Does this mean direct linking isn't possible?

conciselyverbose,

I mean a url ending in the file type that another site (like a forum) can display in line without a bunch of other code they may or may not support.

That's the only thing I'm missing from other places. Everyone wants to drag you to their site with a bunch of peripheral display I have no interest in.

conciselyverbose,

Cool. I think some of the older places I use (that still use bbcode instead of markdown) break if you don't have a file type in the actual url (I can't check any time soon), but not hijacking the direct link is a good step.

I'd be interested in checking it out. Other things that would affect me actually using it full time would be the presence/quality of any tools to organize a library and what your pricing model eventually looks like. I've been flirting with self hosting my stuff but it's just one of many projects I want to do and I never seem to have the time.

I appreciate the quick responses.

Generating new knowledge typically starts with a study. Now, libraries struggle to afford them (cbc.ca) en

The rising costs university libraries are paying to access journals have implications far beyond the ivory tower. From new cancer treatments to debates about foreign policy, new information enters the public domain through academic studies. Now libraries are having trouble affording the subscriptions.

conciselyverbose,

It should be an unconditional requirement that the day your university receives a penny of public funding your papers must be public domain.

The issue isn't that no free options exist. It's that using them doesn't get you the reputation needed to be funded.

conciselyverbose,

Because it's some. It's not a universal requirement.

You obviously can't just take away IP rights for academic research, but you can make all federal funding conditional on literally every academic paper written by any employee of the university being public domain. Schools can preserve their ownership by completely funding themselves, or they can recognize that most of them couldn't exist without massive federal funding and that they're not entitled to privatize the proceeds of that investment. The journals would have no capability to abuse their position because there would be no content left eligible for them to prey on.

conciselyverbose,

Pattern recognition is something modern techniques are very good at.

ChatGPT isn't that. It also isn't intelligent and doesn't know anything. It's basically a jacked up parrot blindly throwing words together.

conciselyverbose,

The problem with that (which I would absolutely support if they want to pull nonsense like this) is that you're already under licenses that preclude that for everything already existing. It's not a real option.

conciselyverbose,

No, but Europeans contribute to open source, too, and if they actually go through with this it's going to fuck up a lot of projects.

conciselyverbose,

Give Apollo a contract guaranteeing free API access until the end of time without nonsense restrictions on content and maybe I'd think about it. Short of that I'm all set.

(No it's not just Apollo. But he's the most wronged and the one I use.)

conciselyverbose,

Yeah, discord is way less bad than anything else I've seen. Tags would be cool but you can change settings per channel and server and as the host you can give people more granular control by using roles.

I don't really know what more you would reasonably want.

conciselyverbose,

Is Red Hat legally able to do it? Yes.

At best that's extremely debateable. The GPL explicitly precludes placing any other restrictions on receiving the code outside of the ones in the GPL. A paywall to receive code from them is allowed. Terminating access for someone exercising the rights explicitly granted to them by the GPL sure as hell sounds like an additional restriction to me. The entire contract you have to sign to receive the code the first time most definitely is.

conciselyverbose,

If they're placing restrictions on the rights they are unconditionally obligated to provide, they are not supporting Linux and they are not supporting open source.

Signing another contract that allows them to punish you for exercising your rights to modify or redistribute code as a prerequisite for receiving the code isn't some small understanding. It's an extremely malicious attack on the core fucking principle of the code they're stealing to sell as their own.

conciselyverbose,

If you don't abide by the terms of the GPL, you do not have permission to modify and redistribute code licensed under it. That means that their entire OS is stolen, and they are selling software they have zero rights to.

Allowing companies to get away with it fundamentally destroys the principles of open source code. Sharing literally every modification they distribute with literally zero restrictions that aren't part of the GPL isn't some nice to have. It's unconditionally mandatory to have any rights to touch the code at all.

conciselyverbose,

This is hilarious.

They already were killing the experience by tanking the algorithm, and there was straight up no path to me ever using the mobile site or their horrendous app, but their full on meltdown in response to the backlash is next level.

  • Todo
  • Suscrito
  • Moderado
  • Favoritos
  • random
  • noticiascr
  • CostaRica
  • Todos las revistas